sintax321
10-22 02:40 AM
Thanks guys. I just sat down and started trowing things on the canvas. It all came together by accedent. I still have some other little stuff to add to it.
I know it is kind of old school to use radial blurs and scan lines but the look so cool.
I'm humbled by yuor comments thank you:goatee:
I know it is kind of old school to use radial blurs and scan lines but the look so cool.
I'm humbled by yuor comments thank you:goatee:
wallpaper Aquarium Animated Wallpaper
GCLONGWAIT
09-16 04:53 PM
Would appreciate guidance from attorneys and anybody gone through such an experience or having knowledge about it. Below is my scenerio:
My I-140 in EB-3 was denied and was appealed. As a response for my appeal, I received a notice of Derogatory Information and RFE.
After receiving this notice, we realized that company's old lawyer unintentionally clicked a wrong answer in the labor application that was filed and approved in 2006. There is the clause on Page one of ETA form 9089, Part C, point # 9, where we have statement if there is any familial relationship of the alien with the owners / partners of the sponsoring company. This was done by the old lawyer and he is no more working for the company.
In the notice, the appeal officer has mentioned "if a familial relationship exists between the beneficiary and the petitioner's owners / partners , and this was not disclosed to the DOL, USCIS may invalidate the labor certification based on this misrepresentation. You are therefore, requested to explain what familial relationship, if any, exists between the beneficiary and the officers of the company."
The above mistake was done intentionally as the company's present lawyer did mention about the familial ties of the beneficiary with the partner of the company in the H-1 application that was approved in 2009 and in the new labor application EB-2 category that was filed in 2009 and still pending. Also, a separate letter regarding the same was sent to the labor department this year along with the other supporting documents as a answer to audit.
Looking at the above scenario, can you all please let me know:
Is there a possibility to explain the appeal Officer that it was an unintentional mistake as it was not meant to hide as in 2009 , that is a year before this notice was sent out, labor department was given the right answer in another labor application and USCIS did approve the H-1 even after they knew that the familial ties did exist.?
OR
Am are they surely going to revoke my old labor?
Any help or guidance would be highly appreciated and anybody gone though the same can please let know their experience.
Thanx in Advance
My I-140 in EB-3 was denied and was appealed. As a response for my appeal, I received a notice of Derogatory Information and RFE.
After receiving this notice, we realized that company's old lawyer unintentionally clicked a wrong answer in the labor application that was filed and approved in 2006. There is the clause on Page one of ETA form 9089, Part C, point # 9, where we have statement if there is any familial relationship of the alien with the owners / partners of the sponsoring company. This was done by the old lawyer and he is no more working for the company.
In the notice, the appeal officer has mentioned "if a familial relationship exists between the beneficiary and the petitioner's owners / partners , and this was not disclosed to the DOL, USCIS may invalidate the labor certification based on this misrepresentation. You are therefore, requested to explain what familial relationship, if any, exists between the beneficiary and the officers of the company."
The above mistake was done intentionally as the company's present lawyer did mention about the familial ties of the beneficiary with the partner of the company in the H-1 application that was approved in 2009 and in the new labor application EB-2 category that was filed in 2009 and still pending. Also, a separate letter regarding the same was sent to the labor department this year along with the other supporting documents as a answer to audit.
Looking at the above scenario, can you all please let me know:
Is there a possibility to explain the appeal Officer that it was an unintentional mistake as it was not meant to hide as in 2009 , that is a year before this notice was sent out, labor department was given the right answer in another labor application and USCIS did approve the H-1 even after they knew that the familial ties did exist.?
OR
Am are they surely going to revoke my old labor?
Any help or guidance would be highly appreciated and anybody gone though the same can please let know their experience.
Thanx in Advance
justAnotherFile
03-21 01:04 PM
Looking at the responses from admins and core group on the Frist Bill threads it appears that the strategy for IV is to
(i) Send mass faxes to senators to establish IV as a significant org
(ii) Use the above leverage and QGA contacts to try and include additional favourable clauses in the bill while still supporting the bill as is.
The 2 main broad clauses that everyone seems to have consensus on is
(A) Re-instatement of AC-21 (paragraph 5) in full so that oversubscribed countries are eligible to use left-over visas from the rest of the world.
(B) Ability to file I-485 while the visa number is retrogressed.
This thread is to discuss alternatives for these 2 main clauses so that various options can be discussed with Senators if they are not willing to put these clauses as is:
For example:
(A) AC-21 clause alternatives
1. Put in the clause for a limited time period like 5 years, this will relieve the curretn backlog as well as make sure that the immigration per country numbers are not skewed for ever.
2. Increase the per-country limits to 25% so it may be skewed but not that much
3. Increase the per-country to 25% for a limited period of time ( 5 years)
4. Have per country limit 10% on current year only. But for recapture from previous years do not impose per country limit.
(B) Filing I-485 when priority dates not curretn
1. allow for filing if I-140 approved and priority dates stilll not curretn
2. allow for filing of 6 months has passed since I-140 approved and priority dates curretn
3. USCIS favourite :-) allow filing if 45 days has passed since I-140 has been filed and priority dates not curretn.
Pleas pitch in with alternative ideas on these 2 main clauses.
(i) Send mass faxes to senators to establish IV as a significant org
(ii) Use the above leverage and QGA contacts to try and include additional favourable clauses in the bill while still supporting the bill as is.
The 2 main broad clauses that everyone seems to have consensus on is
(A) Re-instatement of AC-21 (paragraph 5) in full so that oversubscribed countries are eligible to use left-over visas from the rest of the world.
(B) Ability to file I-485 while the visa number is retrogressed.
This thread is to discuss alternatives for these 2 main clauses so that various options can be discussed with Senators if they are not willing to put these clauses as is:
For example:
(A) AC-21 clause alternatives
1. Put in the clause for a limited time period like 5 years, this will relieve the curretn backlog as well as make sure that the immigration per country numbers are not skewed for ever.
2. Increase the per-country limits to 25% so it may be skewed but not that much
3. Increase the per-country to 25% for a limited period of time ( 5 years)
4. Have per country limit 10% on current year only. But for recapture from previous years do not impose per country limit.
(B) Filing I-485 when priority dates not curretn
1. allow for filing if I-140 approved and priority dates stilll not curretn
2. allow for filing of 6 months has passed since I-140 approved and priority dates curretn
3. USCIS favourite :-) allow filing if 45 days has passed since I-140 has been filed and priority dates not curretn.
Pleas pitch in with alternative ideas on these 2 main clauses.
2011 Animated Love Wallpaper
vivek_k
05-07 03:25 PM
Thanks guys. I would appreciate to know if the nationally known attorneys like Rajiv Khanna, Murthy, Ron, Shustermann are actually worth the money they charge?
more...
va_dude
07-20 05:58 PM
First of all you would need a visa to visit UK.
bhatt
04-02 02:21 PM
I did it online on 3/21/09 and got approved for me and my wife on 3/31/09. 10 days total turn around! I was amazed to see USCIS's efficiency on cases filed online. I heard the opposite that if you file online it was taking long time. Mine was at NSC
For TSC paper filing is faster than eletronic filing;).
For TSC paper filing is faster than eletronic filing;).
more...
joydiptac
04-05 01:43 AM
Know your rights. Don't get scared unnecessarily. You should seek legal advice if you are threatened in any way. If you have not done anything illegal yourself don't be afraid.
Here are some facts which every H1b should be aware of.
Got Pay Stubs? Transferring H1B without Pay Stubs | B'Khush (http://bkhush.com/dev/content/got-pay-stubs-transferring-h1b-without-pay-stubs) .
: J
Here are some facts which every H1b should be aware of.
Got Pay Stubs? Transferring H1B without Pay Stubs | B'Khush (http://bkhush.com/dev/content/got-pay-stubs-transferring-h1b-without-pay-stubs) .
: J
2010 cool desktop wallpaper
marcus12
01-28 02:28 PM
I have finished my 1st MS and was doing my 2nd MS
In fall semester I applied for all online courses and when it was the time of exam I had to leave to India as my Grandfather was very sick.
I was in lot of pressure as I was very close to them so I left. Before leaving I did asked the admission officer in university and she told that I will get all F grades and I can take same courses again in Next semester.
I was ready to do that. So I left USA and came back in January. 2 days before I received a letter from university that I have been dropped off. I was shocked and tried contacting the admission officer. She told me that they can reinstate now for my F1 visa and thats the only way.
I want to know if these is the only way or if there is some other way to get back in status. I dont want to leave country and come back to get reinstatated as I think its too risky.
What are the chances of reinstatement if I have clean history as well as no work records from the time I entered in USA. I have been student from last 4 years from the time I entered USA.
I do want to apply for visitor visa in future. HOw will these situation affect that
In fall semester I applied for all online courses and when it was the time of exam I had to leave to India as my Grandfather was very sick.
I was in lot of pressure as I was very close to them so I left. Before leaving I did asked the admission officer in university and she told that I will get all F grades and I can take same courses again in Next semester.
I was ready to do that. So I left USA and came back in January. 2 days before I received a letter from university that I have been dropped off. I was shocked and tried contacting the admission officer. She told me that they can reinstate now for my F1 visa and thats the only way.
I want to know if these is the only way or if there is some other way to get back in status. I dont want to leave country and come back to get reinstatated as I think its too risky.
What are the chances of reinstatement if I have clean history as well as no work records from the time I entered in USA. I have been student from last 4 years from the time I entered USA.
I do want to apply for visitor visa in future. HOw will these situation affect that
more...
Ann Ruben
01-28 09:49 AM
Because you remained in the US for more than a year after USCIS denied your change of status you are barred from entering the US for 10 years. However, you are entitled to apply for a waiver of this 10 year bar pursuant to �212(d)(3)(A) of the INA which, if granted, would enable you to obtain an L-2 visa and legally enter the US.
If you are not upfront about your prior overstay, you commit visa fraud. As a consequence, you will face a lifetime bar to enter the US with little or no possibility of a waiver.
If you are not upfront about your prior overstay, you commit visa fraud. As a consequence, you will face a lifetime bar to enter the US with little or no possibility of a waiver.
hair Animated Desktop Background
justin150377
06-28 08:55 PM
My lawywer mentioned that they could file Monday July 2nd for packet delivery on Tuesday July 3rd. What is the definitnion of the filing date? Is it done electronically so that the filing date is Monday (the date the packet is sent) and delivery date is Tuesday? Or is the delivered date the filing date.
more...
ashrock11
06-14 08:02 AM
Not on speaking terms. Not legally divorced also.
Thanks for your responses.
Thanks for your responses.
hot pictures All desktop wallpaper
flash.stoffer
08-07 12:55 PM
Hi agian.. :)
Now a otherone is ready.. ;)
Hope you enjoy, like the others... :)
http://img333.imageshack.us/img333/1537/dog4ca.gif
Now a otherone is ready.. ;)
Hope you enjoy, like the others... :)
http://img333.imageshack.us/img333/1537/dog4ca.gif
more...
house Cool Desktop Backgrounds
sarosi
04-16 09:41 PM
I have the following status working with the original H1B employer who filed for my green card petition:
1) PD Jan, 2007, EB3-I
2) I-140 approved and pending AOS
3) 2 yrs. EAD available, expiring Sep. 2011
4) H1B will be expiring within 3 months (1 year left from 6 years limit)
My questions,
1) Can I use EAD instead of extending H1B? I want to stay with the same employer as a
full time employee.
2) If yes, is it required to inform INS? How and when?
3) In that case, how me, my son (middle school student, H4 & pending AOS) and wife's (EAD & pending AOS) stay in US will be justified with no valid I-94 (assuming I am not extending H1B anymore) ?
Answers to my above questions will be highly appreciated.:confused:
1) PD Jan, 2007, EB3-I
2) I-140 approved and pending AOS
3) 2 yrs. EAD available, expiring Sep. 2011
4) H1B will be expiring within 3 months (1 year left from 6 years limit)
My questions,
1) Can I use EAD instead of extending H1B? I want to stay with the same employer as a
full time employee.
2) If yes, is it required to inform INS? How and when?
3) In that case, how me, my son (middle school student, H4 & pending AOS) and wife's (EAD & pending AOS) stay in US will be justified with no valid I-94 (assuming I am not extending H1B anymore) ?
Answers to my above questions will be highly appreciated.:confused:
tattoo animated background please
Anders �stberg
June 12th, 2005, 04:50 AM
Congrats! New lenses is always a thrill. Great pictures too, looks like you made good choices.
more...
pictures Include desktop wallpaper
Queen Josephine
March 24th, 2007, 09:35 PM
Thanks guys. Nik, my boss took the decision out of my hands and had me order the 2 lense option. I'm hoping it's compact enough that I can hike with it. If so, he said he'd take my Canon Pro1 for the shop and I could have this. If I take it, then I'll look into your suggestion.
well queen my long lost thought you were gone forever to never come back friend.Thanks Mark....not gone, just slowing down a bit. Happens sometimes... but thank for the kind thoughts. I aprreciate it.
well queen my long lost thought you were gone forever to never come back friend.Thanks Mark....not gone, just slowing down a bit. Happens sometimes... but thank for the kind thoughts. I aprreciate it.